Figure 4 ASCII Reference¶
Source figure:
- Figure 4 in the published QR trust paper
- visual asset: DEPLOYMENT_ROLLOUT_GRAPH.svg
This ASCII version is the relationship reference for stakeholder alignment and first-deployment ordering.
Deployment Rollout and Stakeholder Alignment
-------------------------------------------
+----------------------------------+
| Starting problem |
| Generic QR trust gap |
| - who owns issuer trust? |
| - who owns runtime safety? |
| - who controls scanner UX? |
+----------------------------------+
|
v
+------------------------------+------------------------------+------------------------------+------------------------------+
| | | |
v v v v
+---------------------------+ +---------------------------+ +---------------------------+ +---------------------------+
| Primary operators | | Primary operators | | Primary operators | | Primary operators |
| Payments | | Merchant ecosystems | | Enterprise and | | Government and public |
| High fraud cost. | | Stable destinations. | | institutional operators | | services |
| Strong incentive. | | Managed dashboards. | | Internal workflows. | | High trust requirement. |
+---------------------------+ +---------------------------+ +---------------------------+ +---------------------------+
| | | |
+------------------------------+------------------------------+--------------+---------------+ |
| | |
v v v
+----------------------------------+ +----------------------------------+ +--------------------------------+
| Strong incentive alignment | | Secondary rollout slice | | Open public consumer QR |
| Best first deployment slices | | Enterprise and institutional QR | | Weak first market |
| 1. Payments | | - known destinations | | - low operator control |
| 2. Merchant ecosystems | | - operator policy exists | | - high privacy resistance |
| 3. Enterprise / institutional QR | | - scanner UX still platform- | | - no clear paying operator |
| 4. Government/public services | | dependent | | - adoption depends on |
+----------------------------------+ | stronger than open consumer QR | | platforms |
+----------------------------------+ +--------------------------------+
Support and control actors
--------------------------
+----------------------------------+ +----------------------------------+
| Secondary operator | | Control point |
| Cybersecurity vendors | | OS and browser vendors |
| - runtime safety signals | | - default scanner UX |
| - redirect analysis | | - mass-market trust display |
| - reputation / malware signals | +----------------------------------+
+----------------------------------+ | |
| | |
+-------------------- supports -------------------+ |
|
+---- affects institutional QR
|
+---- affects open consumer QR
Strategic implication
---------------------
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| The first viable deployment is not "all QR codes on earth." |
| It is the subset of ecosystems that already own enrollment, fraud cost, destination control, or meaningful |
| influence over scanner behavior. |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+